Improved building industry rules in Australia could ensure net benefits of $4.3 billion over a decade, a new analysis has discovered.

In its recent report, prepared for the Australian Building Codes Board, the Centre for International Economics (CIE) looked at the costs and benefits affiliated with complete implementation all 24 recommendations of the Building Confidence report prepared for the Building Ministers Forum (currently titled the Building Ministers Meeting) in 2018 by Professor Peter Shergold and lawyer Bronwyn Weir.

The report discovered that on a contemporary value basis, advantages from implementing all recommendations will surpass expenses involved by $4.3 billion over the decade period starting in 2022.

It states the most significant gains will be in the hands of consumers.

In the long run, consumers (homeowners, building owners and tenants) will get these net advantages, the CIE states in its report.

They might pay higher costs to buy or rent a structure or a property, but the quality of the structure (through fewer defects) will offset it.

It also says that some advantages from national consistency, in terms of lowered cost to building industry, will go to consumers in terms of lowered price or less increment in expense.

Written in 2018, the Building Confidence Report cited excessive gaps in building rules which it states were adding to worries regarding building quality and safety.

These worries had burgeoned amid revelations regarding widespread usage of combustible cladding and the discovery of structural issues at the Opal and Mascot Towers in Sydney in 2018 and 2019.

All total, it released 24 advisements for change. These covered categories like building practitioner registration and training, roles and responsibilities of regulators and authorities, integrity of private building surveyors, info sharing and intelligence, documents and record keeping, inspections regimes, after construction info management, construction product safety and actioning of the recommendations.

In its report, CIE estimated that $4.281 billion in net advantages could be attained before the beforementioned term if all recommendations are put into effect across each state and territory.

This consists of $9.009 billion in benefits against $4.729 billion in expenses.

Benefits would add up as improved compliance and enforcement produced fewer defects, the report stated.

Extra benefits will arrive as a nationally consistent regulatory framework efficiency gains for the building business.

In terms of expenses, about half of these will happen through extra construction expenses.

These may happen via added rectification expenses as more diligent checking procedures inspire a greater number of issues being pinpointed and needing to be rectified during building.

Building to enhanced standards may take more labour and usage of higher quality/more costly materials.

Other expenses include higher costs for training, independent review and mandatory inspection.

Training expenses would elevate as more practitioners must be registered, registration guidelines would become more strict and practitioners would need to take mandatory training in respect of the National Construction Code.

Review and inspection expenses will go up as many recommendations will introduce extra processes in independent audit and review.

The latest report arrives as the Australian Building Codes Board has released model guidance publications in response to the BCR recommendations.

The guidance is complete and concerns key issues including national registration of building practitioners, codes of conduct for building surveyors and fire safety engineers, enhanced building design acceptance processes, mandatory building inspections and independent third-party review of fire and structural safety design.

The guidance is intended to create national uniformity—and sustainability.


Image source: